Clinical Medicine I. Posters
Dr. Behon, Anett
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University
+36306591006
behona@gmail.com
Lateral Left Ventricular Lead Position is Superior to Posterior Position in Long-term Outcome of Patients Underwent Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Anett Behon, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Walter Richard Schwertner, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Eperke Dóra Merkel, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Attila Kovács, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Bálint Károly Lakatos, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Endre Zima, M.D., Ph.D, D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
László Gellér, M.D, Ph.D., D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Valentina Kutyifa, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Annamária Kosztin, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Béla Merkely, M.D, Ph.D., D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Clinical Medicine I. Posters
English
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Medicine
Introduction: Preferring side branch of coronary sinus during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation is empirical due to the limited data on the association of LV lead position and long-term clinical outcome.
Aims: We evaluated the long-term all-cause mortality by left ventricular (LV) lead non-apical positions and further characterized them by interlead electrical delay (IED).
Method: In our retrospective database 2087 patients were registered between 2000 and 2018. Those with non-apical LV lead locations were classified into anterior (n=108), posterior (n=643), and lateral (n=1336) groups. All-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. Echocardiographic response was measured 6 months after CRT implantation.
Results: During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 1150 (55.1%) patients died, 710 (53.1%) with lateral, 78 (72.2%) with anterior and 362 (56.3%) with posterior positions. Patients with lateral position had significantly better outcome in all-cause mortality compared to others (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.90; p<0.0001), which was also confirmed by multivariate analysis after adjusting for relevant clinical covariates (HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.91; p<0.0001). When echocardiographic response was evaluated in the lateral group, patients with an IED longer than 110 ms (ROC AUC 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53-0.73; p=0.012) showed 2.1 times higher odds of improvement in echocardiographic response 6 months after the implantation.
Conclusion: In this study we proved that after CRT implantation only the lateral LV lead location was associated with long-term mortality benefit. Moreover, patients with this position showed the greatest echocardiographic response over 110 ms IED.
Annamária Kosztin
kosztin.annamaria@gmail.com
Poszter
Szabad
elfogadva
poszter
nem rendelkezett róla
4608
11:26
11:29
Anett Behon, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Walter Richard Schwertner, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Eperke Dóra Merkel, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Attila Kovács, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Bálint Károly Lakatos, M.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Endre Zima, M.D., Ph.D, D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
László Gellér, M.D, Ph.D., D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Valentina Kutyifa, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Annamária Kosztin, M.D., Ph.D., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Béla Merkely, M.D, Ph.D., D.Sc., Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest