Mental Sciences I. Posters
Dr. Lévay, Erika Evelyn
Semmelweis University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
+36703636558
levelyn95@live.com
The Relationship between Social Value Orientation and Pathologic Personality Traits
Erika Evelyn Lévay1, Bettina Bajzát2, Eliza Polyák3, Levente Morvai4, Zsolt Unoka5
1,2,5 Semmelweis University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
3,4 Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine
Mental Sciences I. Posters
Hungarian
Mental Sciences
Mental Sciences
Introduction. The concept of social value orientation (SVO) summarizes our preferences in interdependent social scenarios. Previous research showed that Big-5 and HEXACO domains show connection with SVO. We examined whether DSM-5’s pathologic personality traits have similar connections with SVO and with subjects’ expectations regarding the SVO of other people.
Aims. We hypothesized that individualists and competitives think that the other person would behave as they do, and prosocials can anticipate all kinds of SVO categories. We aimed to create subgroups within the SVO categories based on the participants assumptions about the other’s SVO. We presumed that these subgroups would show significant differences regarding their pathologic personality traits.
Method. 75 healthy subjects completed the Slider Measure, a social dilemma developed by Murphy et al. (2011).The test categorizes people into four SVO groups -altruists, prosocials, individualists and competitives. Participants filled out the reversed version of the test: they had to imagine themselves into the place of another person and tell us their expectations of the other’s behaviour. They completed the SCID II Screen Questionnaire and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Data was analyzed using SPSS.
Results. 14 subjects were individualists and all of them expected individualistic behaviour from the other, whereas the 61 prosocials anticipated all SVOs (χ(3,N=75)=15.061, p=.002). We created two subgroups within the prosocials: the ones who think the other would be prosocial (PP, N=33) and prosocials who think the other would be individualistic (PI, N=26). We compared the two prosocial groups and the individualists. The prosocials scored higher in Disinhibition(F(2,70 )=3.784, p=0.028) and Distractibility (F(2,70 ) =3.233, p = 0.045). The PI group scored higher in Negative Affect (F(2,70) =3.401, p=0.039) and Emotional Lability (F(2,70 ) =4.307, p = 0.017). The PI and the individualist group scored higher on Suspiciousness (F(2,70 ) =3.315 , p = 0.042).
Conclusion. Individualists and prosocials differed significantly in their expectations. We were able to distinguish subgroups amongst the prosocials and found significant differences in the three examined groups regarding their pathologic personality traits.
Supervisor: Zsolt Unoka
unoka.zsolt@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
Additional email address of the presenter:
levay.erika_evelyn@semmelweis-univ.hu
Poszter
Szabad
elfogadva
poszter
nem rendelkezett róla
4646
11:16
11:19
Erika Evelyn Lévay1, Bettina Bajzát2, Eliza Polyák3, Levente Morvai4, Zsolt Unoka5
1,2,5 Semmelweis University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
3,4 Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine