Pathology and Oncology I. Posters
Dr. Vetlényi, Enikő
1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research
+36304169960
eniko.vetlenyi@gmail.com
Metabolic Characteristics of Clear Cell and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas
E Vetlényi1, I Krencz1, T Dankó1, D Moldvai, G Petővári1, J Pápay1, Gy Végső2, A Sebestyén1
1 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
2 1st Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Pathology and Oncology I. Posters
Hungarian
Pathology and Oncology
Clinical Medicine
Introduction
Metabolic reprogramming plays an important role in formation and development of kidney cancer. The bioenergetic need of tumor cells could be supported by various metabolic pathways, therefore, clarifying the presence and activity of metabolism-related proteins may provide an opportunity to identify new therapeutic targets.
Aims
Our aim was to characterize the metabolic features of clear renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs) and papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs) in details using immunohistochemical and in vitro analyses.
Methods
Human tissue samples were collected from patients with CCRCC or PRCC. To assess the expression of mTOR signaling and metabolic markers in CCRCCs and PRCCs, immunohistochemistry was performed using tissue microarray sections. Renal cell carcinoma cell lines (786-O, A498, ACHN) and human kidney proximal tubular epithelial cell line (HK2) were used to analyze the effect of different metabolic inhibitors (rapamycin, BPTES, ACSS2 inhibitor, etomoxir) on tumor growth. The expression of mTOR-related and metabolic enzymes was analyzed by WES Simple technique.
Results
The expressions of GLS, ACSS2, CPT1A (markers for alternative bioenergetic pathways) and ATPB (a marker for oxidative phosphorylation) were significantly higher in PRCCs than in CCRCCs. In contrast, expression of p-S6 (mTORC1 activity marker), GLUT1, and PFKP (glycolytic markers) was higher in CCRCCs. In our in vitro studies, all markers were expressed at a lower level in the HK2 cells as compared to the renal cell carcinoma cell lines. Rapamycin had the highest antiproliferative effect on 786-O cells that had the highest p-S6 expression. 786-O was also sensitive to glutaminase inhibitor, however, those cell lines which express both isoforms of GLS were resistant. ACSS2 inhibitor and etomoxir had a modest effect, however, glutaminase and ACSS2 inhibitors enhanced the antiproliferative effect of rapamycin in some of the cell lines.
Conclusion
In contrast to CCRCCs mTORC1 hyperactivity and high glycolytic marker expressions, PRCCs could use alternative bioenergetic pathways (glutaminolysis, acetate utilization, fatty acid β-oxidation) to fulfill bioenergetic demands. Moreover, our in vitro results suggest potential roles of metabolic inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma treatment.
Anna Sebestyén
E-mail address: hsebanna@gmail.com
Poszter
Szabad
elfogadva
poszter
nem rendelkezett róla
4794
11:29
11:32
E Vetlényi1, I Krencz1, T Dankó1, D Moldvai, G Petővári1, J Pápay1, Gy Végső2, A Sebestyén1
1 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
2 1st Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary