PhD Scientific Days 2022
Budapest, 6-7 July 2022
Clinical Medicine V. (Poster discussion will take place in the Aula during the Coffee Break)
Comparison of imaging modalities for left ventricular noncompaction patients
Előadó neve
Dr. Horváth, Márton
Előadó munkahelye
Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University
Előadó telefonszáma
+36206701717
Előadó e-mail címe
horvathma@gmail.com
Az előadás címe
Comparison of imaging modalities for left ventricular noncompaction patients
Szerző(k) neve és munkahelye
Márton Horváth1, Dorottya Kis1, István Márkusz2, Márton Tokodi1, Anna Réka Kiss1, Zsófia Gregor1, Kinga Grebur1, Attila Kovács1, Béla Merkely1, Hajnalka Vágó1, Andrea Szűcs1
1 Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, 1122, Hungary
2 Dept. of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, 1117, Hungary
Bemutatás módja
Poszter
Szekció
Clinical Medicine V. (Poster discussion will take place in the Aula during the Coffee Break)
Language of the presentation
Hungarian
Preferred session
Clinical Medicine
Összefoglaló szövege
Out of 2D and 3D echocardiography (2DUS, 3DUS) and cardiac MR (CMR), it is not decided which is better for follow-up of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) patients. Thus, we aimed to assess the correlation (C) and agreement (A) between CMR, 2DUS, and 3DUS by comparing the volumetric and strain parameters in a hypertrabeculated and a healthy population.
Thirty-eight LVNC patients (male: 25; average age: 36±13 years) with good left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) without any comorbidities and 34 healthy (H) subjects (male: 19; average age: 31±14 years) were enrolled in our study. A pairwise comparison was performed among the three modalities.
There was good correlation and agreement in the healthy group for volumetric data, except for end-systolic volume (ESV) in the 2DUS-CMR (C: r= 0.21, p= 0.19; A: PE= 70%, p: 0.06) comparison. However, with acceptable correlation only less agreement was found in the LVNC group, namely, in 2DUS-3DUS end-diastolic volume (C: r= 0.73, p<0.001; A: PE= 28.9%, p= 0.04), in 2DUS-CMR stroke volume (SV; C: r= 0.54, p<0.001; A: PE= 29%, p<0.001) and in 3DUS-CMR SV (C: r=0.75, p< 0.001; A: PE= 25%, p <0.001). Functional parameters (EF and global strains) in the healthy group showed good agreement but no correlation; in the LVNC group, none of the functional parameters were correlated and were mostly not in agreement.
In this study found good agreement between modalities in the healthy group; however, hypertrabecularization may result in inaccuracy by comparing modalities, especially when evaluating strain parameters.
University and Doctoral School
Semmelweis University, Károly Rácz Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine
Supervisor
Andrea Szűcs MD, PhD
Publication of my abstract
I give consent to the publication of my abstract on the website of the congress.
Kind
Szabad
Status
elfogadva
Accepted presentation method
poszter
Előadás fájl jóváhagyás
nem rendelkezett róla
Előadó
4704
Start
11:00
End
11:05
Authors (legacy)
Márton Horváth1, Dorottya Kis1, István Márkusz2, Márton Tokodi1, Anna Réka Kiss1, Zsófia Gregor1, Kinga Grebur1, Attila Kovács1, Béla Merkely1, Hajnalka Vágó1, Andrea Szűcs1
1 Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, 1122, Hungary
2 Dept. of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, 1117, Hungary