Clinical Medicine VI. (Poster discussion will take place on the terrace of the room during the Coffee Break)
Dr. Kiss, Boldizsar
Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest
+36 20 666 3575
b.kiss96@gmail.com
Finding the Holy Grail: Ranking List of Prediction Scores in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Boldizsár Kiss1, Rita Nagy2,3, Tamás Kói2, Henriette Mészáros1, Bettina Nagy1, Ádám Pál-Jakab1, Péter Hegyi2,3, Béla Merkely1, Endre Zima1
1 Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest
2 Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest
3 Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest
Poszter
Clinical Medicine VI. (Poster discussion will take place on the terrace of the room during the Coffee Break)
Hungarian
Clinical Medicine
Introduction
Ongoing changes in medicine and the societal create a range of ethical challenges for clinicians. In the context of post cardiac arrest syndrome, ethically difficult decisions must be made when to continue or withdraw life-sustaining therapies. According to the guidelines, prognostication after cardiopulmonary resuscitation should base on clinical examination, biomarkers, imaging and electrophysiological testing. Several prognostic scores exist to predict neurological and mortality outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients.
Methods
Our systematic search was conducted on 8th November, 2021 in four databases: Medline, Embase, Central and Scopus. The patient population was successfully reanimated adult patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We included all prognostic score systems in our analysis which were suitable to estimate the primary outcome (neurologic function) and the secondary outcome (mortality). From the eligible articles data were collected by two authors independently. The accuracy of data was validated by a third reviewer.
For each score and outcome we collected the AUC values and their CIs and performed a meta-analysis using the random effect model to gain pooled AUC estimates with 95% CI. We made Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) curves using 2 × 2 contingency tables. The statistical analysis was performed by R software.
Results
16501 records were identified and 69 met the selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. Out of these, 12 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled AUC (95%CI) was 0.89 (0.85-0.93) for CAHP, 0.84 (0.80-0.87) for OHCA, and 0.80 (0.74-0.85) for C-GRApH to predict neurological outcome at hospital discharge; 0.84 (0.73-0.96) for NULL-PLEASE and 0.84 (0.76-0.92) for OHCA to predict in-hospital mortality. High heterogeneity was shown in the analysis of CAHP (I2=75%; p < 0.01) and NULL-PLEASE (I2=81%; p < 0.01) scores.
Conclusion
Our results show that CAHP is the most accurate score system to predict neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Not only for accuracy but also for the rapid availability of the necessary data, we recommend the use of the CAHP scoring system in everyday clinical practice. NULL-PLEASE and OHCA scores are quite accurate to predict in-hospital mortality.
Funding
BK was supported by grant EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009.
Semmelweis University, Doctoral School of Theoretical and Translational Medicine
Prof. Endre Zima
I do not give consent to the publication of my abstract on the website of the congress.
Szabad
elfogadva
poszter
nem rendelkezett róla
6033
11:25
11:30
Boldizsár Kiss1, Rita Nagy2,3, Tamás Kói2, Henriette Mészáros1, Bettina Nagy1, Ádám Pál-Jakab1, Péter Hegyi2,3, Béla Merkely1, Endre Zima1
1 Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest
2 Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest
3 Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest