Poster Session I. - D: Pathological and Oncological Sciences
Dr. Kocsmár Éva, PhD
Semmelweis University, Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine
+36305819025
evakocsmar9@gmail.com
Prognostic Role of Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas in intestinal and non-intestinal type gastric adenocarcinomas
Éva Kocsmár1, Ákos Jakab1, Luca Szalai2, Bettina Zengő1, Ildikó Kocsmár3, Tibor Várkonyi1, István Kenessey4, Attila Szijártó5, András Kiss1, Tamás Vass5, Gábor Lotz1
1: Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University
2: Department of Pathology, National Institute of Oncology
3: Department of Urology, Semmelweis University
4: National Cancer Registry, National Institute of Oncology
5: Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University
Poszter
Poster Session I. - D: Pathological and Oncological Sciences
Hungarian
Pathological and Oncological Sciences
Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cause of death from malignancies worldwide. The aggressive nature of GC, late diagnosis and lack of reliable histological prognostic markers contribute to poor survival rates. Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) is a newly identified histological feature characterized by a direct connection between tumor cells and adipocytes at the tumor invasion front.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of SARIFA in GC.
Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on 333 GC patients. Cases were categorized as intestinal (n=171) and non-intestinal (n=162) according to Lauren's classification of histological type. SARIFA was assessed on H&E-stained digital slides at the invasion front, recording the presence (yes/no) and quantifying the number of foci where tumour cells directly contacted adipocytes. Tumour buds (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) were evaluated according to the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference.
Results: SARIFA+ status correlated with negative prognostic factors, including higher pT stage, incomplete resection margins, perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, and higher lymph node ratios in both intestinal and non-intestinal groups. Despite SARIFA's association with higher TB and PDC categories, the correlation between SARIFA foci and TB/PDC numbers was weak (intestinal: rho=0.29, rho=0.19; non-intestinal: rho=0.25, rho=0.25). Time-dependent ROC curves indicated that the optimal SARIFA cut-off for 5-year survival is the "present/absent" categorization. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses identified SARIFA+ as an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival in non-intestinal GC (p=0.003; p=0.03).
Conclusion: SARIFA is a readily assessable histological marker that provides valuable prognostic information for GC. Further research is needed to integrate SARIFA into routine diagnostic practice.
Funding: Supported by the EKÖP-2024-72 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry For Culture And Innovation from the Source of the National Research, Development And Innovation Fund and the K_22 142604 grant of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office.
Semmelweis University
Dr. Éva Kocsmár
I do not give consent to the publication of my abstract on the website of the congress.
after finishing doctoral studies with absolutorium (PhD)
Szabad
elfogadva
poszter
nem rendelkezett róla
2223
16:36
16:42